0
0
0 results
iTeroED

The list is empty right now.

0
0
Filters
clear all

Content Content
Full mouth rehabilitation and restoration
Chairside dentistry
Full edentulous denture
Smile makeover
3D printing applications
Orthodontics
Pre-alignment with restorative
Patient communication & practice growth
Dental implants
iTero applications iTero applications
iTero™ NIRI technology (Near Infra-Red Imaging)
iTero™ TimeLapse technology
iTero™ Occlusogram
Scan report
Invisalign® Outcome Simulator
Invisalign® Outcome Simulator Pro
Invisalign® Progress Assessment tool
MyiTero™ portal
Apply
0 results
iTeroED

The list is empty right now.

Publications
Peer-reviewed literatures on the advances of dentistry and white papers.
Publications
Peer-reviewed literatures on the advances of dentistry and white papers.
0
0
Filters
clear all

Content Content
Full mouth rehabilitation and restoration
Chairside dentistry
Full edentulous denture
Smile makeover
3D printing applications
Orthodontics
Pre-alignment with restorative
Patient communication & practice growth
Dental implants
iTero applications iTero applications
iTero™ NIRI technology (Near Infra-Red Imaging)
iTero™ TimeLapse technology
iTero™ Occlusogram
Scan report
Invisalign® Outcome Simulator
Invisalign® Outcome Simulator Pro
Invisalign® Progress Assessment tool
MyiTero™ portal
Apply
iTeroED
Proactive adoption of Align™ Oral Health Suite on iTero™ Scanner for presentation of findings in routine consultation to drive patient engagement and profitability.
iTeroED
Using iTero Element intra-oral scanner to scan for implant-supported fixed complete dentures
Abstract Impressions in implant dentistry aim to accurately relate an analogue of the implant or implant abutment to the other structures in the dental arch. The impression material, impression technique, implant angulation, and the number of implants, all affect the accuracy. In the case of implant-supported fixed complete dentures (ISFCDs) traditional impression techniques require the doctor to accurately capture multiple units in one step. Doctors often encounter cases where one unit is not captured properly while another is perfect, so they take another impression only to find that they captured the problematic unit, but the impression of the previously perfect unit is no longer acceptable. Recent data suggests that intra-oral digital impressions may be considered a reliable alternative to conventional impression materials for ISFCDs. The ability to “segment” the impression process of large restorations and scan different segments individually eliminates much of the uncertainty that is part of taking a multi-unit conventional impression. It also ensures that units are scanned at the appropriate time, when in an ideal soft tissue condition.
iTeroED
Digital dental pathways modernizing visualization, designs, and clinical outcomes: Align Technology creating comprehensive dental solutions for modern practices.
Introduction As a general dentist, I see potential patients walk into my practice with all sorts of oral health issues every day. Most of them are not aware of all that is happening inside their mouths and generally come to see me for issues that are obvious to what they see in front of a mirror or when they are in discomfort and pain. We are traditionally trained to attend to the prospective patient’s chief complaint, and many clinicians have a hard time communicating other important findings. Usually, those findings stay between the clinician and assistant and are kept on paper or your practice management software for months, even years, without being addressed until the next emergency visit. Sometimes, the clinician feels uncomfortable adding other procedures to the treatment plan, fearing that he or she will be labeled as an individual trying to upsell treatment. Unfortunately, we have seen in the media cases of dental professionals taking advantage of people by overtreating them. While these are very few individuals, a bad reputation has impacted the dental guild worldwide. As a professional, I have learned to remove biases and assumptions about the person in the dental chair. I show all the evidence and offer comprehensive treatment plans based on the individual’s perceived needs to provide function and esthetics with long-term solutions, not just repair. To present evidence and deliver comprehensive education, I leverage the power of technology, specifically iTero™ scanners. These devices equip me with the tools to not only attract potential patients to my practice but also help me to create digital records for diagnosis, educate patients for informed decision-making,1 plan, design, treat, and monitor their progress throughout their journey (Figure 1). This emphasis on technology underscores the evolution of dental practice and its benefits for both professionals and patients. I
iTeroED
Adopting iTero™ scanners to diagnose, communicate, and treat patients – a general dentist perspective.
Introduction As a general dentist, I am always looking for solutions to make the day-to-day activities of my practice easier for me and my staff and more enjoyable for my established and potential new patients. I want to ensure patients have a memorable time so that they look forward to returning and referring their family and friends to become our patients. This may sound ironic, given the reputation visits to the dentist have had for decades. However, dentistry has changed, and I am proud to be one of those professionals to lead this change. Last year, I incorporated the Align™ Oral Health Suite into my new patient exam and recall and emergency exam workflows. The process was seamless, and the patient-friendly product interface uses language familiar to the person sitting in your dental chair, helps patients follow the conversation where they can actively participate and feel part of the process during a consult. Innovations have been developed since then, and I will describe a clinical case of how I have implemented them into my practice, from scanning, diagnosing, designing, treating, and monitoring
iTeroED
A fully integrated diagnostic process through advances in scanning technology
Abstract The iTero Element 5D imaging system is the first intraoral 3D scanner integrated with near-infrared imaging (NIRI) technology. NIRI has the potential to revolutionize patient treatment and the overall workflow in dental offices. This technology provides practitioners with an aid for early detection of interproximal caries above the gingiva, which is one of the gravest threats to oral health (equal in seriousness to periodontal disease) per the World Health Organization (WHO). In the near-infrared electromagnetic spectrum range of 0.7 to 2.0 μm, the iTero Element 5D Imaging System uses light of wavelength (= 850 nm), which interacts with the hard tissue to provide additional data of the tooth structure. The dentin will appear bright, with areas of pathology or demineralization appearing as white spots on the display. The iTero Element 5D imaging system, the latest incarnation of NIRI technology, is an “innovative, integrated optical diagnostic aid,” using a class 1 laser, as Keshav stated in the iTero Element 5D Clinical Guide (Near-infrared imaging technology in dentistry — iTero Element 5D). It gives practitioners the ability to view multiple dimensions of data, as well as to virtually manipulate the model for a comprehensive view. It is the logical next step in digital diagnostic technology and is quickly replacing both conventional impressions and first-generation intraoral scanners. Advanced scanning technology together with artificial intelligence (AI), streamline the treatment and diagnosis process into the future of dentistry.
iTeroED
Reflected near-infrared light versus bite-wing radiography for the detection of proximal caries: A multicenter prospective clinical study conducted in private practices
Objectives: The aim of the present prospective multicenter clinical study was to compare the detection of proximal caries with near-infrared light reflection (NILR) versus bitewing radiography (BWR). Materials and methods: Intraoral scans were performed on 100 patients in five dental clinics using an intraoral scanner (iTero Element 5D, Align Technology, Tempe, AZ, USA) that includes a near-infrared light source (850 nm) and sensor. Reflected near-infrared light images of posterior teeth were used by the individual dentists to detect proximal caries and the results were compared to the BWRs. In a total of 3499 proximal surfaces of molars and premolars which were examined, 223 carious lesions were detected by BWR, while NILR detected 549 carious lesions. Caries detection using both methods was also done by an expert team of five dentists, highly experienced in NILR image interpretation, who used the same sets of clinically-obtained data. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated for caries detection by both the dentists and the expert team. Fifty-nine of the detected carious lesions were clinically treated and the observations during caries excavation were compared with those done with NILR and BWR. Statistical analysis to compare between NILR and BWR diagnosis was performed using non-parametric two-sided McNemar's Chi-Square test with the significance level set at p < 0.05. Kappa coefficients were calculated to assess the level of agreement between the two caries detection methods. Results: Accuracy of NILR detection of early enamel lesions was 88% and that of carious lesions involving the dentino-enamel junction (DEJ) was 97%. Accuracy was found to be higher at 96% and 99%, respectively, when the same data were examined by the expert team. Direct observation during caries-excavation treatment suggested that NILR detected early enamel lesions that were not detectable with BWR alone. Conclusions: Within the limitations of the present study, NILR was more sensitive than BWR in detecting early enamel lesions and comparable to BWR in detecting lesions that involved the DEJ.